Buffalo Bills Positional Previews: HB
![]() |
|
|
For years, the Buffalo Bills have enlisted the services of a big, bruising fullback. We've seen good ones (Sam Gash) and we've seen some pretty bad ones (Daimon Shelton, in my humble opinion, was a waste of a roster spot). The 2007 season, however, marks the end of an era - the Bills will no longer be using a fullback in their running game. Instead, a "new" position has been implemented into Steve Fairchild's offense - the "halfback".
Positional Goals
Try not to make the mistake of thinking that we'll see something drastically different out of our lead blocker position. Rather than lining up a fullback in our backfield, we'll use tight ends in an H-Back role. The personnel is different, the name of the position is different, but the demands of the position likely won't be drastically changed. They'll still lead our running back through holes. They'll still pick up the blitz. They'll still be lead blockers on special teams.
The only difference of note is versatility. Tight ends are, in general, more athletic than fullbacks (especially in Daimon Shelton's case). We now have players in our backfield who can do more - they're more athletic blockers, they're more athletic blitz pickups. But the true advantage gained is receiving ability (again, especially in comparison to Daimon Shelton). We may actually see some designed pass plays to our fullback, rather than the position being a black hole in the passing game.
Personnel
88-Ryan Neufeld: Neufeld is the senior member of our tight ends and has struggled a bit with injuries the past two seasons. But the H-Back role is a position he has played well at before, and as of right now he has the inside track at the starting gig. He is a solid blocker (both offensively and on special teams), has good hands and has enough experience to be our best option there at this point. Barring a setback or a huge training camp from his competitors, the job is his.
80-Derek Schouman: The seventh-round pick out of Boise State has the potential to bring far more than Neufeld brings to the H-Back position. A smooth athlete with above-average hands, Schouman is the perfect fit for H-Back thanks to his less-than-elite tight end size (6'2", 233). Once he develops his very raw blocking skills, he could be a mainstay at this position for years - not to mention a difference-maker in this offense.
Rounding it out: Brad Cieslak. Once a leading candidate for this position, it wouldn't surprise me a bit to see Cieslak miss the final cut for this roster. He was undrafted for a reason, and his upside appears much more limited than Schouman's.
Outlook
Like so many of the Bills' offensive moves this off-season, the newly implemented H-Back position brings yet another dimension of versatility to J.P. Losman's arsenal. We should not expect too much of an impact from the players at this position, but we'll definitely see more from them than we ever saw statistically from a fullback in Buffalo. This is an interesting experiment that deserves our close attention this season.
0 recs |
5 comments
Comments
The one unique aspect of the HBack...
We should be on the lookout for if ESPN Classic runs the Fiesta Bowl - I rewatched it (before we drafted him), and Schouman constantly helped keep the intense and normally overwhelming Sooner rush from getting to Zabranskie too often, as well as several times laying an excellent chip block, THEN getting a reception.
by Dock Ellis on Jun 19, 2007 11:08 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agree and disagree with you Brian...
I can't believe how few people talked about how bad Shelton was last year. Over on bb.com I remember being the only one for a while talking about how bad that guy was. He couldn't even lead block despite that being his one role on the team. He often got shoved back or completely whiffed on blocks. And I still have visions of him bobbling that pass against the Jets that resulted in an INT for TD to end the '05 season dancing through my head. Good riddance to him and the FB position on our team!
I agree with you about the versatility the HB can provide. Each of the guys we have on the roster who can play the position run pretty well, have good hands and can play TE when needed. I've also liked Cieslak's blocking in the handful of games he was around for last season.
Onto the personnel we could keep at the position, I see Cieslak as the top candidate to be the #1 HB. Once we dumped the FB last year, Cieslak looked pretty good in our offense from the HB and TE position. I thought he looked pretty fluid out catching passes and was surprisingly better than I thought he would be. I think he has more upside in our offense than Neufeld and I think his roster spot looks pretty secure, IMO.
Now who the other HB we keep is another question. Neufeld is the savvy vet while Schouman looks like a potential surprise rookie 7th rounder. I can see us keeping Cieslak and Neufeld with Schouman on the PS to start the season, but would prefer a Cieslak/Schouman combo making the active roster. I don't think Neufeld offers anything that Cieslak and Schouman can't offer other than experience. Remember, Neufeld was undrafted and was out of the league for a couple of years for a reason too.
I love Schouman's athleticism and potential in our offense. I think with his improving blocking and above average receiving ability he offers much more than Neufeld and I'd rather him make the roster and see PT as a rookie.
Cieslak and Schouman work for me...
by Kurupt on Jun 19, 2007 1:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Personnel
I still stick with Neufeld ahead of Cieslak because I think he offers a bit more to the team overall - I think he would be a better stopgap at the HB position than Cieslak, because Schouman's the starter in a year or two. Neufeld's a hard worker, a good special teamer and he can even long snap if needed. He does too much, IMO, to warrant keeping Cieslak over him.
But I do like Cieslak, don't get me wrong. He is a surprisingly good athlete, but again, I think his upside is a lot more limited than Schouman's, and I like the veteran/rookie combo better than the young guy/rookie combo.
by Brian Galliford on Jun 19, 2007 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
H-Back
H-back, may have been referred to as a "half back" or an F-back, but using the terminology "halfback" distorts the position, IMO.
by The Dean on Jun 20, 2007 12:23 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You're probably right
H-Backs are still referred to as F-Backs because that's a recent development - they were re-named the F-Back by Norv Turner when he first became an offensive coordinator.
"H-Back" pretty much means a hybrid of a TE and a FB. Half tight end, half fullback. Half back. That's what I'm working off of.
Not sure I've seen you around these parts before, Dean - welcome to the site!
by Brian Galliford on Jun 20, 2007 3:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
























