2007 Buffalo Bills: Season Lowlights
![]() |
|
|
Are you an optimist? Welcome to the club; I'd much rather treat you to stories like this than the one you're about to read. But when the Buffalo Bills finished with a losing record for the third straight year - and missed the playoffs for an eighth - you knew we'd have to talk about them. The lowlights of the Bills' 2007 season.
So let's get this over with. Earlier today I posted 7 highlights for 7 wins; now, I present you 9 lowlights for 9 losses:
#1 - The Kevin Everett Injury.
Upon exiting his post as Bills GM, Marv Levy made the case that the Bills need a tight end. Sadly, folks, the Bills lost an athletic presence at that position that the coaching staff felt was ready to blossom when Kevin Everett's spine injury ended his playing career.
Yes, the miraculous recovery that Everett has made has been inspirational. Yes, Buffalo will always be a city that has an emotional connection with Everett, no matter where life takes him. But from a very basic standpoint - a selfish one, even - Everett's injury cast an early shadow over the Bills' season, and cost them a fine developing player as well.
#2 - The Slow Start.
Dick Jauron has coached in Buffalo for two seasons, and in both campaigns, his Bills got off to incredibly slow starts that ultimately kept the team out of the playoffs. In '06, the Bills got back to .500 by Week 15 after starting the season 2-5; in '07, it was a 1-4 start - including two one-point losses - that doomed their playoff chances. Until the young Bills can win some of their early games, they will perpetually face a season-long uphill climb to the playoffs, as they've had to endure (and nearly accomplished) the past two seasons.
#3 - The Downfall of J.P. Losman.
Back in training camp, NFL pundits everywhere - most notably ESPN's John Clayton - were claiming that the Bills' offense, led by J.P. Losman, would be scoring in bunches in 2007. Early struggles, combined with a knee injury and the steady (if unspectacular) play of Trent Edwards, forced Losman into yet another on-the-bench, off-the-bench season.
It's not that Losman doesn't have the tools. Most of Buffalo's coaches and personnel men still swear that they believe Losman has what it takes to succeed at this level. But that's not the point - after being handed the opportunity to be this franchise's savior, he let the opportunity slip through his fingers. Now, question marks have resurfaced at the position.
#4 - The Prime-Time Meltdowns.
Yes, the Bills played both of their prime-time games this season against the two teams many say will be in the Super Bowl (Dallas and New England). That doesn't matter - despite sellout crowds, Buffalo found new, grueling ways to disappoint in both contests. While the Dallas game may have been fun, and proved that Bills fans deserve some respect, the last-second loss off the toe of rookie kicker Nick Folk sent Bills fans into a manically depressed bye week.
A month later, the outcome was - if possible - worse. Riding a four-game win streak, the Bills were absolutely annihilated by the visiting Patriots, who themselves were coming off a bye week (for a fourth straight season). It's not that the Bills lost that game - let's face it, they were going to anyways - it's that they barely showed up for the contest. That loss left far deeper wounds than the Cowboys loss earlier in the season.
![]() |
|
|
#5 - The Rash of Injuries.
If you hear any of your friends that cheer on other teams complain about injuries, feel free to put them in their place. No NFL franchise came close to encountering the mass of injuries that the Bills endured this season. 17 players wound up on Injured Reserve this year, including 10 players who were regular participants throughout the season.
What's worse is that many of these players are not yet fully developed pro prospects. Two of those, FS Ko Simpson and MLB Paul Posluszny, hurt in particular; these two were expected to be cogs on the defense, making quick strides to become leaders on the club. Instead, Simpson will be facing a position battle next season, while Posluszny will re-acquire his middle 'backer position with just three pro games under his belt. That's valuable experience lost for young, vital players to this organization.
#6 - The young vet disappointments.
I'm calling out three individuals here - and yes, it may be a bit unfair, but I'm doing it anyways. Defensive ends Aaron Schobel and Chris Kelsay, along with wideout Lee Evans, were expected to provide the young vet leadership - along with improving production - on a young team. They did fine in the leadership department. They fell far short, however, in production. Far short.
Schobel finished the regular season with 6.5 sacks - tied for his career low, which he amassed in his rookie season. Kelsay had just 2.5. That's 9 total sacks from men who will collectively make $74 million on their current contracts. In a Cover-2 defense, where pass rush is premium, that's not close to the type of production we need. Evans, if possible, was even more disappointing - he followed an 82-catch, 1200-yard 2006 season with a 55-catch, 850-yard season. He was not close to being the dominant presence many felt he could be; now it's unclear whether or not he can fill that #1 role in seasons to come.
#7 - Poor Play in Poor Weather.
It's not a shock that Buffalo's most important games in 2007 were played in awful weather conditions. This is a team based in Western New York, after all. In two games - a Week 15 loss to Cleveland and a Week 16 loss to the New York Giants - the Bills played a total of 7 quarters of football, coming away with 7 points in the process. (The first quarter of the Giants game was fair weather.) Buffalo's offense was problematic all year, but poor weather shut them down at the most critical of times. This young team needs to learn to beat the elements and their opponents.
#8 - The end-of-season demise.
Going hand-in-hand with the poor weather lowlight, the Bills finished their season with three consecutive losses after fighting tooth and nail to get back above .500 at 7-6 by Week 14. In 2006, they fought tooth and nail to get back to 7-7 - and promptly lost two straight. If Jauron has a check mark in my book, it's that his Bills have collectively gone 1-5 in the final three weeks of the season since he's gotten here. That needs to change no matter how the first three quarters of a given season goes - no team likes backing into the playoffs. Just ask Pittsburgh.
#9 - The remaining question marks.
2007 also saw the escape of offensive coordinator Steve Fairchild and GM Marv Levy. Both positions will likely be filled in the very near future; no matter how they shake out, though, there will most definitely be question marks at those two spots heading into 2008. Will a new GM want a new head coach? Jauron is certainly safe for '08, but how well he meshes with a new boss is still unclear. Can a new offensive coordinator put pedigree behind him and make the Bills' offense... you know... score points? These are the biggest questions that need quick answers as the Bills head into the off-season.
0 recs |
9 comments
Comments
Dude you did these backwards
by sireric on Jan 2, 2008 8:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Come on Brian
Of those who were lost for the year, I wouldn't exactly say that they were stars in any way. Poz and Simpson were starters, Price started on O and I suppose Webster would count as a starter, but the rest of the guys were all backups and depth. A team like the Rams was decimated by injuries...Orlando Pace, Leonard Little, Tye Hill, 3 other starting OL, all on IR along with the games Bulger and Steven jackson lost. That was a team where injuries ruined their season.
I think the overall lack of talent is what hurt us most this year. Sure we lost depth all season, but we simply don't have enough good players to be contenders...yet. I think the whole injury issue is just an excuse for having subpar talent....
by Kurupt on Jan 3, 2008 12:18 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
OK
You're right about the lack of talent. But to say that the injuries this team suffered is a "lame excuse", just because it's one that is made often, is just flat out incorrect. And anyway, the point in the article was not that the injuries caused us to suck this year, it was that young guys like Poz and Simpson - who were supposed to use this season to develop into solid starters for us - didn't get that opportunity. That hurts more than anything.
by Brian Galliford on Jan 3, 2008 7:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough
I guess in this situation, for your article, it isn't really a lame excuse. I do consider it a lame excuse for all those people who blame missing the playoffs on the injuries. In that case, yes, it is a lame excuse. We just weren't talented enough to be true contenders this year.
At the time, losing Simpson was a huge deal to me. I don't think he's that great of a player, just an average free safety. BUT after thinking about it, I would have loved to see if he could have stepped up his game this year. Getting hurt on the first series of the season has to be the worst feeling for a guy. I hope he spent all this time studying film and dedicating himself to strengthening his upper body. I just hope he learned how much he needed to improve on taking the proper angle and tackling. Those were extremely weak spots in his game last year.
And did we really suffer with Keith Ellison or Jim Leonhard out of the lineup? :)
by Kurupt on Jan 3, 2008 12:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think
I guess you would have to look at the games lost and try to determine if the injured players were really missed or not. I wouldn't use injuries as an excuse for the way this year turned out, but they sure didn't help either.
by sireric on Jan 3, 2008 7:49 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Slow starts, poor finishes
by Nick BensalemPA on Jan 3, 2008 9:30 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I like Jauron
I like the way he gets the most out of his players, but his record is hard to ignore.
by sireric on Jan 3, 2008 9:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
I'm not sure the injury thing can be blamed on the easy camp work. We had a lot of broken bones, random foot/knee/ankle injuries, etc that are just part of playing football. If there were more muscle strains and tweaks, I'd be more confident in considering conditioning in that. I think the early season injuries were just "bad breaks", har har.
by Kurupt on Jan 3, 2008 12:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Dj
If they find a way to screw up this draft it will set the franchise back big time. With 10 picks and 4 in the first 75, the maneuverability to get some high end talent at key positions is right there for the taking if a savvy GM is there to take the reins.
Is the draft here yet? My favorite event of the year
by MARVelous on Jan 3, 2008 10:58 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 

























