Potential Bills Free Agent: WR Drew Carter
![]() |
|
|
What is the Buffalo Bills' biggest need this off-season? This community says it's neck-and-neck between defensive tackle and wide receiver; needless to say, there are a huge amount of Bills fans who would like nothing more to see the Bills add a wide receiver this off-season.
What happens, though, if the "big names" available - such as Bryant Johnson and Ernest Wilford (stay tuned for more on them) - are off of the market too early for the Bills to make a serious run at them? There are Plan B options that wouldn't provide us with much comfort heading into next season, but at least have some potential. One of those players is Panthers free agent wideout Drew Carter. The young veteran has started intermittently next to Steve Smith for the past two seasons, yet hasn't been nearly consistent enough to take pressure off of Smith in the Panthers' aerial attack. Still, the youngster has been somewhat productive as a red zone target and has yet to maximize his potential - so there would be some value to a Carter signing.
Cat Scratch Reader's Take
Jack Finney, head blogger at SB Nation's Panthers blog, Cat Scratch Reader, has seen Carter play first-hand over the first portion of Carter's career. He was kind enough to answer a few questions of mine in relation to Carter; his answers help us get a better grasp on Carter as a player:
Carter had a lot of opportunity to emerge as the #2 opposite Steve Smith, but never seemed to be very consistent. Do you think he has #2 capability?
Carter has been a bit of an enigma with Carolina. He started last season with a bang (4 catches and 2 TD's in game one) but then finished the season with only 4 TD's despite starting the second half of the season. He just disappeared at times. At 6'4" and tons of speed he should be a bigger threat than he is. Can he be a solid #2? It seems he should be but he hasn't yet.
What are the chances, in your mind, that the Panthers re-sign Carter to see if he can finally lock down a starting spot permanently?
I'm expecting the Panthers to re-sign him though they haven't given any indication yet. This is his fifth season so it's "put up or shut up" time. If the Panthers don't re-sign him I'm sure someone else will give him a chance. I would like to give him one more season. Maybe by then Dwayne Jarrett will be ready to go.
In general, what do you think are the strengths and weaknesses of Carter's game?
I don't really know what his problem is. He battles drops and sometimes just can't get open on those critical third downs. He improved as a blocker though so I don't think it's a strength issue. His strengths are his height and speed. His weaknesses are drops and failure to get open. He is an average blocker and has average hands.
Discussion Time
Clearly, Carter is not the ideal external candidate to bring in as a starter - in fact, it's not a guarantee that he'd start at all here - but he's the type of free agent that the Bills' front office seems to favor. Carter fits the Teyo Johnson, Darian Barnes and Jason Webster mold - he's a young player with a large amount of talent that the coaches can try to mold into a decent starter. He'd also be a much cheaper option than the likes of Johnson, Wilford or Hackett.
Carter is, and will continue to be for at least the next year, a project player. He is not a player that every Bills fan would get jacked up about if brought in, but something about the kid's raw skills has me intrigued. If the Bills aren't able to scrape up a big enough offer to the likes of Wilford or Hackett, I for one wouldn't mind seeing Carter brought in on a short-term deal - he's talented, and it may take a different setting for him to finally realize his potential.
I'd love to hear your thoughts not only on Carter and his impending free agency, but how you'd like to see these bios/interviews structured as we move forward. Be sure to check out our free agent database, a one-stop shop where you can track all of these interviews. Have at it, folks.
|
|
||||||
| Year | G | Rec | Yds | Avg | TD | FL |
| 2005 | 3 | 5 | 103 | 20.6 | 1 | 0 |
| 2006 | 14 | 28 | 357 | 12.8 | 3 | 0 |
| 2007 | 16 | 38 | 517 | 13.6 | 4 | 0 |
| TOT | 33 | 71 | 977 | 13.8 | 8 | 0 |
0 recs |
23 comments
Comments
Interesting
by btk0930 on Feb 12, 2008 9:56 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
No thanks
He has a ton of trouble getting open and is a terrible route runner. All I've ever seen the guy do is run straight downfield. He's not physical and will not break tackles once he gets the ball. In no way does he fit our need for a WR with YAC.
If this is the FA WR we sign, I will be livid.
by Kurupt on Feb 12, 2008 11:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
K
by Brian Galliford on Feb 13, 2008 7:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If we bring in 2 WR's, like we should...
I've seen this guy enough to know he's not going to provide us anything we don't already have. We need a starting caliber WR and a talented rookie to groom.
by Kurupt on Feb 13, 2008 10:30 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Carter
by sireric on Feb 13, 2008 7:38 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
No way!!!
The FA market sucks for WR's... With the 11th overall pick the Buffalo Bills select either Limas Sweed, or Mario Mannigham
No FA at the position will be worth what he is paid, nor will you get the bang for the buck you will with Sweed or Mannigham
by DC Fan on Feb 13, 2008 9:42 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Disagree
I still think the best wideout the team could sign is Ernest Wilford, simply because he's by far the most consistent option available. He's got the ability to have a big impact on this offense simply by the matchup problems he creates in the red zone.
by Brian Galliford on Feb 13, 2008 9:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
"His talent"
I'd rather bring in a better vet and a talented rookie.
by Kurupt on Feb 13, 2008 10:45 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with Brian
I think we all agree that the Bills should sign a vet and draft a kid. Wilford (if he's signed) isn't the long term answer, the kid is. If the Bills draft lets say Bowman from OSU, whats to say that by week 7 he doesn't play well enough to unseat Wilford from his starting role?
by sireric on Feb 13, 2008 11:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Bowman
by krytime on Feb 13, 2008 12:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I did see that
by sireric on Feb 13, 2008 12:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I was referring to Carter
I like Wilford's hands and size. He has made a good redzone threat in his career. He'd be a very solid pickup while a rookie is groomed.
I prefer Wilford or Hackett, with Johnson as a distant 3rd. Carter wouldn't register on my radar.
by Kurupt on Feb 13, 2008 1:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sweed or Manningham with the 11th?
I have to very much disagree with taking Sweed or Manningham with the 11th. Its not that they aren't first round talent, which I think they are. But if you look across the board at all the available receivers in this upcoming draft (Kelley, Hardy, Doucet, Bowman, Bennett, Caldwell, Avery, Thomas, ect.) along with as Sweed and Manningham, I just don't see the front office reaching on a wide out. There will be real quality in 2nd and even 3rd this year. Moreover, WRs historically don't contribute that much in their first year.
Because of that, I think the Bills should take a flier on someone like Carter (who has the measurables) and can look to the D-line in the first round (the most important factor to the Cover-2). All this conjecture is moot by the free agency period, of course.
by DCRumbler on Feb 13, 2008 11:33 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
first ever post
by sireric on Feb 13, 2008 11:42 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LOVE the username
I, too, agree - wideout isn't the way to go with our top pick. A veteran that can play within himself is our best option for a #2, and finding a developmental player to groom behind them is a must - whether that's a rookie or a young free agent.
by Brian Galliford on Feb 13, 2008 11:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Later round WRs & thanks for the name shoutout
Anyway, I see that you and sireric think we should wait until the 2nd or 3rd to draft a young guy, like I do. This is probably a topic for another thread, but who would you two (and anybody else for that matter)like to draft in those later rounds? Personally, I think we could draft someone like DJ Hall (Alabama) or Paul Hubbard (Wisconsin) in the 3rd or even 4th round, and they would be steals. They have the size (6-2 and 6-4 respectively) and speed (both are sub 4.5 runners). IMO, I their biggest knock is that they just didn't have big-time QBs pitching to them in college. Their stock may rise a bit after the combines, but there is no reason we couldn't get one of them even in the 4th if we were to stretch it. IMO, focus on the D-line and replacing Ellison as a starter (ideally, I think Ellison would be a fine backup) first, then go after the young WR. I am really hoping we get someone like Hackett as a stop-gap.
I know that drafting a WR in the first is flashy and fun, but I think its an easy mistake to make. So many clubs miss early - consider the fact the the most coveted receiver in the FA market is arguably a first round bust, or just take a look at Detroit for that matter. You really can do well in the mid to latter half of the draft. When you consider what round we got the best receiver in our franchise's history, I think that emphasizes the point more so.
by DCRumbler on Feb 13, 2008 12:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
WR
I love Bowman from OSU, Earl Bennett from Vanderbilt, and Hall as well.
by sireric on Feb 13, 2008 12:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Glad you like the site
by Brian Galliford on Feb 13, 2008 12:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
1st round WR
I don't know what i'm missing that you guys are seeing, but I think Willfork, Hackett, and Johnson all suck.. none of them have the track record of success at the NFL level to dictate a contract that supply and demand will get them; and none of them will have the potential to ever push Lee Evans as a #1. Limas Sweed will cost the same as a FA and I think he comes in as a strong #2 reciever who in 3 seasons will be a perrenial pro-bowler pushing Lee Evans to be the featured guy.
Since he's a first rounder, you do like you did with Whittner and take the guy you need at the draft pick you have, and don't look back...
by DC Fan on Feb 13, 2008 2:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
1st round WR
Rookie receivers in general, fail to produce in their first year, this team needs a strong presence opposite Lee Evans, not somebody who doesn't quite know what they are doing. I'm all for bringing in a rookie WR, I just don't want him to have to start, if he earns it with solid play, great, but I don't want to force it on him.
by sireric on Feb 13, 2008 2:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

























