Reopening the WR Trade Market?
[editor's note, by Brian Galliford] Bumped from the diaries. Excellent points brought up as usual by jri111. End Note
From Saturday's Buffalo News:
Give us your thoughts on our Buffalo Bills pick -- Tennessee State CB Dominique Rogers-Cromartie. You might be surprised I didn't give the Bills a wide receiver. Don't be. Word is the Bills don't have a receiver rated high enough to warrant the 11th overall selection. I sense that the Bills might try to trade for a veteran wideout before the draft.There are two major roadblocks to such a thought, however. First, the WR trade market is nearly non-existent. Other teams like Philly have tried unsuccessfully to trade for big names such as Roy Williams and Larry Fitzgerald without much luck, and there is little chance that other teams would have better luck. Second, issue of money. Money, of course is always a concern when it involves the Bills. Any WR Buffalo trades for would most likely require a large contract. That's hard to justify when your own star receiver is entering his contract year without a new deal. So why am I wasting my time with this if it can't be done? Because it can be done.
Of course, it would not be easy. Buffalo would simply have to "make an offer they can't refuse" to teams such as Detroit or Arizona for the likes of Roy Williams or Anquan Boldin. What is that offer? Well, most players are not traded for very high draft picks anymore because of the overly large contracts. The highest draft pick given up is usually a second rounder or some combination of a second round pick and a later or future pick. So to get over this, Buffalo would have to offer a higher pick than normal: how's the 11th overall pick sound? They would also have to pony up the big money for whoever they trade for. That's a lot to give up. Many would say too much. I would say they were wrong.
Buffalo is a a young team with some vets entering the prime of their careers (Evans, McGee, Crowell, etc.). Their window is starting to open. However, in today's NFL, the window is smaller than ever. Can the Bills afford to wait three seasons for a guy like Devin Thomas or Malcolm Kelly to develop into the receiver they need to be successful? With the exception of CB, the defense is in place. A young QB with potential is entering his second year in the league and a star running back is about to be born. They have one star WR locked up for at least two more seasons (considering the franchise tag) and are one or two weapons away on offense from having a contender.
So why not? Trade the 11th pick! We all agree that there is not good value for Buffalo there anyways. Turn it into value. Pay the money. And reap the rewards. If the Bills want to pro actively get better, they may have to look at other ways of doing so at the WR position aside from the draft. The trade market is currently non-existent for wideouts. If they want it, they'll have to create it. They create a market by making a hard and solid offer. Make teams like Detroit or Arizona at least think long and hard about it before they reject it.
The Bills are in a quandary at the 11th pick this year. They have a dire need at WR, but no player worth taking at that pick. The worst thing about this, however, is not the value of the players - that can be argued - it's the overall talent. The top end talent is just not there and taking one of those players would require taking on a lot of question marks. Admittedly, this is a far reaching and fantastical idea. However, sometimes it requires great ideas to achieve great things. We all dream of the Bills achieving great things. They now need a great idea to get them there.
This FanPost was written by a registered user of Buffalo Rumblings. Its views do not necessarily reflect the reviews of Rumblings' editorial staff, but are just as valued as our own.
0 recs |
24 comments
Comments
I think
Also I wouldn't want to trade for one of those guys anyways.
"Can the Bills afford to wait three seasons for a guy like Devin Thomas or Malcolm Kelly to develop in the receiver they need to be successful?"
ABSOLUTELY the Bills can wait. It is going to take Edwards that long to develop into a top QB anyways. And what happens if Edwards doesn't develop like the team hopes he will? You get stuck with an aging and overpaid WR on your roster instead of a 25 year old player in his prime. The Bills need to take care of the future and hope Edwards develops. I've never seen so many people thinking a 7-9 team is just a few moves away from super bowl contention.
by kaisertown on
Apr 14, 2008 9:40 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
WR Trade
For me, it's not about a lack of patience. Roy Williams is a rare and young talent, and he is better than any wide receiver that's available in this draft.
by Fort Worth on
Apr 14, 2008 10:48 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Come on now
"I've never seen so many people thinking a 7-9 team is just a few moves away from super bowl contention."
There is a difference between being excited about the Bills being a playoff contender then thinking they are in Super Bowl contention. The Bills should fight for a playoff spot next year and the way you build a Super Bowl contender is by getting into the playoffs first, you will build confidence, big game experience, and team morale among a young nucleus like we have. Philip Rivers has developed fast because he learned through losing the big games and by getting playoff experience, so did Eli Manning. 8 years and counting without a playoff birth won't do anything to help Edwards or Lynch develop that killer instinct and edge that playoff contenders get. I also have more faith in Edwards I guess but that is a conversation for another discussion. Building for the future is smart, sensible and obviously the route to go. Now I am not advocating for trading the 11th pick but eventually you have to decide when its time to make your run because in six years time we will be discussing whether or not Marshawn is running on tired old legs. Consider that the Colts run took them four-five years before they got their ring and the Chargers are about three years into their run and they're still without one. I think we are a potential playoff team and if we can get there next year we will definitely be a Super Bowl contender within the Lynch/Edwards/Whitner/Poz era for many years, maybe starting our own Super Bowl run in two-three seasons. Sorry for the long post but in short we are a few moves away from the playoffs, once you are in the playoffs you will see the gap to becoming a Super Bowl contender narrow noticeably fast.
by poz on
Apr 14, 2008 11:02 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I generally agree but
by Joe P. on
Apr 14, 2008 11:30 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
some thoughts
"we will definitely be a Super Bowl contender within the Lynch/Edwards/Whitner/Poz era for many years, maybe starting our own Super Bowl run in two-three seasons."
You did it too. I like Edwards, I think he should make some strides this year and prove to be an average starting QB in a couple seasons with the potential to develop into a top 10 QB down the road. But to assume that he is going to develop any sooner than that is ignoring the entire history of the QB position. The Bills are not a super bowl contender, nor will they be next year. Maybe in 2010 they can be a dark horse candidate like the Browns will be this year. I know that will sound pessimistic to some and I realize that a quick development from Trent isn't impossible. The Pats are still loaded and they will be a great team as long as Tom Brady stays at the top of his game. Same goes for Manning and the Colts. If David Garrard is the QB that he looked like last year than they are contenders for the next 3 years at least. The Chargers have a great young core on defense and an improving Philip Rivers on offense. Buffalo simply isn't in the same class as those teams; in fact, they aren't even close. I can't stress enough how important QB play is and the Bills have a second year starter who will probably throw a similiar number of INTs as he does TDs.
"eventually you have to decide when its time to make your run"
I don't think that you do. I think the way to stay in contention for long stretches is to ignore the immediate future while drafting and ALWAYS take the player who you think will have the best career. You draft guys and sign them for 5 years and hope that you can resign them and keep them around for another 3-5 years. New England just drafted a raw WR a couple seasons ago in the first round. The Chargers and Colts just took a WR last year too. I doubt New England was thinking about a super bowl when they traded out of the first round last year. Antonio Cromartie was surrounded by question marks when SD took him.
by kaisertown on
Apr 15, 2008 12:06 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
couple of more thoughts
"The Bills are not a super bowl contender, nor will they be next year"
The point I was arguing is that nobody is saying they will be next year, simply that if we can reach the playoffs we may be seasons from now. As I said in my earlier post and as you noted me saying in yours:
""we will definitely be a Super Bowl contender within the Lynch/Edwards/Whitner/Poz era for many years, maybe starting our own Super Bowl run in two-three seasons."
The key word there is in that ERA. And I also don't believe it is too far-fetched to think Edwards could be the QB to take us into contention in a few years time. You write:
"I like Edwards, I think he should make some strides this year and prove to be an average starting QB in a couple seasons with the potential to develop into a top 10 QB down the road. But to assume that he is going to develop any sooner than that is ignoring the entire history of the QB position"
A couple of stats from some young QBs show that development for a rookie QB, especially one who gets playing time early, comes to fruition around year three or four. I think Edwards can easily be better than an average QB in a couple of seasons. Take a look at these young QBs and their development.
Eli Manning, Year 3: 57.7%- 3,244 - 24 TD 18 INT
Philip Rivers, Year 3: 61.7%- 3,388 - 22 TD 9 INT
Ben Roethlisberger, Year 3: 59.7%- 3,513- 18 TD 23 INT
Marc Bulger, Year 3: 63.2%- 3,845 - 22 TD 22 INT
Jay Cutler, Year 2: 63.6%- 3,497 - 20 TD 14 INT
So I don't agree that Edwards shouldn't develop at a similar pace. I reiterate, no one thinks we're going to the Super Bowl this year but to think we don't deserve to believe the playoffs are realistic now and title contention can be three to four years from now is being pessimistic. Our defense will get better, especially if we add a young DE like sireric has been advocating and our offense has nowhere to go but up and its very very young. Finally, we may not be close to the Pats and Colts right now but by the time Edwards develops, Marshawn hits his prime and the defense is ready in three to four seasons those teams will be very much past the days of their respective dynasties. Marvin Harrison might be done already and Peyton is getting older while the Pats are simply old at every position.
I agree with you that in 2010 we may be a dark horse but I just don't think anyone believes our time is now but it can certainly be our time to start tasting the playoffs again. Once again, I don't think your post was harsh or anything. We're simply enjoying a good discussion that I think should be had because I know Bills fans are split about this.
by poz on
Apr 15, 2008 12:43 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
reopening WR
by btk0930 on
Apr 14, 2008 10:09 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Steep price
I don't think Roy W is worth the #11 pick. He's way too inconsistent and always seems to be nicked up in some way.
Fitzgerald is pretty much the only WR worth the #11 pick IMO and he isn't going anywhere.
I wonder if there are any other vet WR's who will be on the block that wouldn't cost a 1st round pick and could come in and start across from Evans...
by Kurupt on
Apr 14, 2008 10:56 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
It shouldn't take much
How about a 6th round draft pick to Tampa Bay for Michael Clayton?
I'm not saying that Clayton is the answer, but he could start in Buffalo immediately. Whether or not he is starting-caliber is a different story. He is still young and has some upside. I know Clayton is one big, tough dude. I think he could benefit from a change of scenary.
by Fort Worth on
Apr 14, 2008 11:10 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Clayton
I wonder what the chances of TB releasing him are...
by Kurupt on
Apr 14, 2008 11:25 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Releasing Clayton
by Fort Worth on
Apr 15, 2008 12:06 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Clayton
I'd offer them no more than a 6th and may even try to get him for a 7th or 2009 6th rounder...
by Kurupt on
Apr 15, 2008 12:27 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Releasing Clayton.
by krytime on
Apr 15, 2008 1:47 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
#11 for Williams
by labill on
Apr 15, 2008 12:08 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Roy W
For us, if we trade for him, we'd have to give him a big contract. With that in place, would we have enough money to resign Evans (and some other players)? It seems a little much to sign 2 WR's to big contracts in the same year. I would expect the Bills not to sign Evans if Williams was acquired, and I'm not sure Evans would sign here when he knows he could likely get a bigger deal elsewhere as a #1 WR. We'd be left in the same position next year as we're in now except we'd have Roy instead of Lee.
They would be a nice pairing, but I think it'd be too much money and too high a pick for Williams. I really see a trade like that simply opening another can of worms next offseason. Roy's been overhyped since he's gotten to the NFL. He'll have a monster game here and there, but disappear for lengthy stretches of time. He really should be a dominant WR in this league, but hasn't been that yet.
by Kurupt on
Apr 15, 2008 1:18 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
how about...
Jackson, 6-5, 241 pounds is only 25 years old and would fit the Bill. I'm sure he would like a pay raise as well, considering he is only making $520,000 in '08 and $545,000 in '09.
Also, the Chargers have Eric Parker and Legedu Naanee, so they wouldn't be short of a man to take Davis' spot in the slot.
what do you think it would take for the Chargers to deal him?
by jri111 on
Apr 14, 2008 11:45 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Jackson
SD would be dumb to trade Jackson for anything less than a 1st rounder. He's just starting to come into his own and could really be a stud for SD this year. I'd love to have him on the Bills, but it's not possible unless we foolishly trade away a high pick or multiple picks.
by Kurupt on
Apr 15, 2008 12:31 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sorry boss....
by Harris on
Apr 15, 2008 8:38 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good idea though
We should've gotten Barrien (CHI) before he went to the Vikes... is he worth 6yrs/40mil?... maybe, but he was a proven commodity.
by osmanBAE on
Apr 15, 2008 3:06 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I would do this
- You will have to pay that guy with a new deal
- You will have to pay Evans with a new deal or trade him, cuz he will NOT be happy to see some other guy come in and get big $ while he has worked his butt off for 4 years and not received what he think he fairly deserves.
by MARVelous on
Apr 15, 2008 11:39 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Team to watch for a Value WR
Signed D. Northcutt last yr
Signed J. Porter this yr
Traded for T. Williamson this yr
What about M. Jones or R. Williams? Both former 1st rd picks who haven't lived up to expectations. R Williams had a decent 07 campaign, but with the signing of Porter where does williams fit in? M. Jones is just a flat out disappointment, but has great size at 6"6 230lbs for the endzone.
Williamson could be a training camp cut, but he is the only Deep Threat that the Jags have. So they have a surplus of 6" WRs. I wouldn't want to go into 2008 hoping one of these guys is our hope for #2 WR spot, but they have experience and fit what the Bills need.
As I see it, if one of these WR's become the odd man out. I think it is a good option to explore for less or nothing depending on swinging a late rd pick before 1 is cut or picking one up after getting cut.
by Rudy916 on
Apr 15, 2008 12:49 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Jags WR's
by Kurupt on
Apr 15, 2008 1:10 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'd trade for Roy Williams in a heartbeat.
by krytime on
Apr 15, 2008 4:21 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Agree 100%
by labill on
Apr 15, 2008 7:38 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs















